https://jns.vn/index.php/journal <p><strong> Giấy phép xuất bản: 439/GP-BTTTT ngày 13/7/2021</strong><strong><br /> DOI: 10.54436/jns - ISSN: 2615-9589 - e_ISSN: 2734-9632</strong></p> <p><strong><br /></strong>Thông tin về các hoạt động đào tạo, khoa học &amp; công nghệ thuộc lĩnh vực điều dưỡng; giới thiệu, đăng tải kết quả nghiên cứu khoa học; trao đổi kinh nghiệm trong hoạt động đào tạo và bồi dưỡng kiến thức về điều dưỡng.</p> Trường Đại học Điều dưỡng Nam Định vi-VN Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng 2615-9589 https://jns.vn/index.php/journal/article/view/1365 <p><strong>Objectives</strong>: To assess students’ perceptions and attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in learning and to analyze the associations of academic major, year of study, and academic performance with their perceptions and attitudes.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong>: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 462 students selected by stratified random sampling from March 1 to May 30, 2026. The questionnaire assessed perceived AI literacy, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, concerns/risks, calibrated trust, attitudes, and intention to continue using AI. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0, with chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests, odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and exact p-values.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong>: The mean scores for perceived AI literacy, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness were 3.89 ± 0.653, 3.88 ± 0.568, and 3.96 ± 0.585, respectively. The mean concerns/risks score was 3.77 ± 0.62, with the greatest concern being inaccurate medical information generated by AI. Calibrated trust, positive attitude, and intention to continue using AI had mean scores of 3.95 ± 0.633, 3.94 ± 0.630, and 3.88 ± 0.625, respectively. Year of study was significantly associated with attitude (p = 0.002), whereas academic major and academic performance were not.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Students generally had favorable perceptions and attitudes toward AI; however, prompting skills, information verification, academic integrity, and data privacy need to be strengthened. AI education should be introduced early and progressively tailored to students’ year of study.</p> Quang Pho Truong Thi Chieu Truong Cong Danh Tran Thi Minh Thu Tran Thi Cam Van Le Thi My Tien Nguyen Huynh Nhu Nguyen Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2026-09-14 2026-09-14 9 05 23 33 10.54436/jns.2026.05.1365 https://jns.vn/index.php/journal/article/view/1318 <p><strong>Objective</strong>: To evaluate the status and relationships between discharge planning care, family-centered care, and caregiver satisfaction within the pediatric healthcare context at three general hospitals in the Southwestern region of Vietnam.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong>: A descriptive–correlational study was conducted among 400 parent-caregivers of hospitalized children in three general hospitals. Data were collected using validated structured questionnaires, including a Discharge planning scale, a modified Family-Centered Care Assessment for Families, and a Caregiver satisfaction scale, all measured on a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and mediation analysis.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong>: Discharge planning was generally practiced (mean = 3.72), with lower performance in lifestyle-related guidance and provision of written educational materials. Family-centered care was moderately implemented (mean = 3.40), with notable gaps in shared decision-making and caregiver engagement. Caregiver satisfaction was relatively high (mean = 3.76), particularly in assessment and monitoring domains, although communication and education showed variability. Educational attainment was the only factor significantly associated with satisfaction (p = 0.038). Discharge planning was negatively associated with family-centered care (β = −0.266, p &lt; 0.001), while neither discharge planning nor family-centered care showed a significant association with overall caregiver satisfaction. Mediation analysis indicated that family-centered care did not significantly mediate this relationship (p = 0.898).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Despite favorable satisfaction levels, family-centered care remains suboptimal and its role in linking discharge planning to caregiver outcomes appears limited. Strengthening structured discharge education and enhancing caregiver engagement through standardized family-centered care based protocols may improve pediatric care quality.</p> Phi Hieu Vo Maxima Floranda Lualhati Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2026-08-28 2026-08-28 9 05 6 22 10.54436/jns.2026.05.1318