Ngôn ngữ sử dụng
Cách trích dẫn
Tải xuống
Tóm tắt
Objectives: This study aimed to assess family support behaviors among patients with type 2 diabetes at the 108 Military Central Hospital.
Participants and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted from December 2023 to May 2024 in the Endocrinology Department of the 108 Military Central Hospital, involving 135 patients with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist (DFBC) was used to evaluate family support levels.
Results: Among the participants, 55.5% experienced low family support, 14.8% medium support, and 29.7% high support. Positive support behaviors, such as “Eating together,” “Providing advice on timely and accurate medication use,” and “Encouraging participation in physical activities,” were reported as occurring “frequently” and “always” by 72.0%, 52.6%, and 52.0% of patients, respectively. Conversely, non-supportive behaviors, particularly “Nagging about blood sugar testing,” were observed “frequently” and “always” by 35.6% of patients.
Conclusions: Family support for patients with type 2 diabetes remains limited. Effective diabetes management requires active involvement from both the patient and their family, with the latter playing a central role. Interventions to educate and raise awareness among family members are essential to improve their engagement in supporting diabetes care, reducing complications, and enhancing the quality of life for patients.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr:138:271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023.
Ramkisson S, Pillay BJ, Sibanda WJAJoPHC, et al. Social support and coping in adults with type 2 diabetes. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017 Jul 31;9(1):1405. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1405
Lee AA, Piette JD, Heisler M, et al. Diabetes distress and glycemic control: the buffering effect of autonomy support from important family members and friends. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1157-1163. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2396.
Fisher LW, Chesla CA, Bartz RJ, et al. The family and type 2 diabetes: a framework for intervention. Diabetes Educ. 1998 Sep-Oct;24(5):599-607. doi: 10.1177/014572179802400504.
Lu Q, Qu L, Xie C, et al. Relationship between social isolation and Glycaemic control of people previously diagnosed with diabetes: secondary analysis from the CHARLS. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 19;14(3):e076106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076106.
Patterson JMJFsm. Families experiencing stress: I. The Family Adjustment and Adaptation Response Model: II. Applying the FAAR Model to health-related issues for intervention and research. Family Systems Medicine, 6(2), 202–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0089739.
Ruhee D, Mahomoodally FJJoD, Disorders M. Relationship between family meal frequency and individual dietary intake among diabetic patients. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015 Aug 8;14:66. doi: 10.1186/s40200-015-0187-5
Dong C, Liu R, Huang Z, et al. Effect of exercise interventions based on family management or self-management on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Nov 14;15(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01209-4.
Al Hayek AA, Robert AA, Babli S, et al. Fear of self-injecting and self-testing and the related risk factors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0221-8.
Mayberry LS, Osborn CYJDc. Family support, medication adherence, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1239-45. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2103.
công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Attribution-phi thương mại 4.0 International Giấy phép .
Bản quyền (c) 2025 Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng