Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9) among Vietnamese undergraduates

HAND - HEART - HEAD - HONOR
pdf (Tiếng Việt) Download: 0 View: 0

Working Languages

How to Cite

Do, M. S., Do, T. H., & Vu, T. H. O. (2026). Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9) among Vietnamese undergraduates. Journal of Nursing Science, 9(03), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.54436/jns.2026.03.1259

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Objective: To translate and evaluate the measurement properties of the Vietnamese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9) in nursing undergraduates.

Methods: A methodological study was conducted in two phases: (1) forward–backward translation and cultural adaptation based on international guidelines; and (2) a cross-sectional survey to assess measurement properties according to the COSMIN framework. Content validity was evaluated by expert review and cognitive interviewing; structural validity by confirmatory factor analysis; and reliability and construct validity by internal consistency and hypothesis testing through correlations.

Results: The Vietnamese UWES-9 demonstrated satisfactory content validity and conceptual relevance within nursing education. Structural analysis supported a three-factor model and indicated a strong general factor. The scale showed high internal consistency and construct validity consistent with hypotheses, with engagement positively associated with study motivation and negatively with perceived stress.

Conclusion: The Vietnamese UWES-9 met key measurement criteria and can be used to assess academic engagement among nursing students for research and monitoring purposes. Further studies involving other health professions programs and longitudinal designs are warranted to examine predictive validity and broader applicability.

https://doi.org/10.54436/jns.2026.03.1259

Keywords

Gắn kết học tập, Sinh viên điều dưỡng, Thang đo UWES-9 Academic engagement, Nursing students, UWES-9 scale
pdf (Tiếng Việt) Download: 0 View: 0

References

Lei H, Cui Y, Zhou W. Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 2018;46:517-28. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054

Nguyen Doan-Hanh Nguyen, Phuong Vu Nguyen, and Huong Thi Pham. Student Engagement in Vietnamese Higher Education (V-EIHES): The Relationship Between Learning Environment, Engagement, and Academic Achievement. Sage Open. 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244025139236

Tăng Thị Thùy, Đỗ Linh Chi, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Khánh, Dương Phương Thảo, Nguyễn Thị Kim Tranh. Đánh giá mức độ gắn kết của sinh viên với nhà trường trong quá trình học tập: Nghiên cứu tại Trường Đại học Giáo dục - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam 2022;18(6):57-64. https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-8957/12210610

Pham TTH, Ho TTQ, Nguyen BTN, Nguyen HT, Nguyen TH. Academic motivation and academic satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of academic engagement and academic self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2024. DOI:10.1108/JARHE-10-2023-0474.

Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2006;66(4):701-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Carmona-Halty MA, Schaufeli WB, Salanova M. The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9S): Factorial Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance in a Chilean Sample of Undergraduate University Students. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01017

Wei Z, Yang T, Gu X, Dong J, Hassan NC. Psychometric validation of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student-9 in Chinese undergraduate students. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1486363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1486363

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.

Ying W, Mingxuan L, Qian Z, Shuxian Z, Yufang G, Kefang W. The mediating role of professional commitment between the clinical learning environment and learning engagement of nursing students in clinical practice: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today. 2023;121:105677. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105677.

Nguyễn Văn Tuấn, Huỳnh Thị Ngọc My, Nguyễn Thị Xuân Huỳnh, Nguyễn Huỳnh Trúc Mạnh1, Lê Quang Minh1, Võ Minh Thư, Huỳnh Văn Lộc, Nguyễn Thanh Liêm. Động lực học tập và các yếu tố liên quan của sinh viên điều dưỡng Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ 2023. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ.62:230-7. DOI: 10.58490/ctump.2023i62.432

Li Y, Lerner RM. Interrelations of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive school engagement in high school students. J Youth Adolesc. 2013;42(1):20-32. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5.

Tran TD, Tran T, Fisher J. Validation of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) 21 as a screening instrument for depression and anxiety in a rural community-based cohort of northern Vietnamese women. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-24.

Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2004;25(3):293-315. DOI: 10.1002/job.248

Joseph F. Hair Jr., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th Edition: Annabel Ainscow; 2019. 834 p.

Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2015 2015. ISBN 9781462515363. xvii, 462-xvii, p.

Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2016. xvii, 534-xvii, p.

Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(2):234-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x.

Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

Gómez-Urquiza JL, Velando-Soriano A, Membrive-Jiménez MJ, Ramírez-Baena L, Aguayo-Estremera R, Ortega-Campos E, et al. Prevalence and levels of burnout in nursing students: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;72:103753. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103753.

Wickramasinghe ND, Dissanayake DS, Abeywardena GS. Validity and reliability of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student Version in Sri Lanka. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3388-4.

Tsubakita T, Shimazaki K, Ito H, Kawazoe N. Item response theory analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-S) using a sample of Japanese university and college students majoring medical science, nursing, and natural science. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2839-7.

Chi LC, Tang TC, Tang E. Psychometric properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-S) in the Taiwanese context. Curr Psychol. 2022:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03737-0

Zhang L-Y, Wang X. Reliability and Validity of the Student Teacher Professional Identity Scale in Pre-Service Kindergarten Teachers. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2018;06:252-60. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2018.68021

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Nursing Science